735
By Obulukhu Musasia
Edwin Sifuna, the Secretary-General of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), is at a defining moment in his political career.
Known for his sharp intellect, fearless articulation, and unwavering commitment to democracy, Sifuna has been one of the most recognizable voices in the opposition.
However, recent political realignments within ODM have raised critical questions about the party’s ideological direction and whether Sifuna can continue to remain its face while staying true to his core principles.
With ODM’s leadership seemingly warming up to Kenya Kwanza—a coalition it once vehemently opposed—many supporters feel betrayed. The party that once stood as the vanguard of opposition politics now appears to be negotiating for political convenience rather than standing firm on the values that defined its struggle.
This shift has led to growing discontent among the party’s rank and file, and some believe Sifuna should take a principled stand by resigning and joining a political outfit that aligns with the people’s aspirations—Martha Karau’s People’s Liberation Party (PLP).
The Dilemma: Staying in ODM or Making a Bold Move?
ODM has historically been the party of resistance, a political powerhouse that stood against electoral injustices, corruption, and state capture. However, recent developments suggest the party is now more focused on survival and power-sharing rather than upholding the ideals it once championed.
Edwin Sifuna has been a vocal critic of Kenya Kwanza’s policies, repeatedly calling out its leadership for governance failures. Now that ODM is seen to be collaborating with the same government he has opposed, how does he reconcile his long-standing stance with the party’s new direction?
If he stays, does he risk being seen as just another politician willing to compromise principles for political expediency?
On the other hand, joining Martha Karua’s People’s Liberation Party could offer Sifuna a fresh platform to continue fighting for democracy, constitutionalism, and accountability. PLP remains one of the few political movements that have refused to compromise with the Kenya Kwanza administration, insisting on holding the government accountable.
Martha Karua herself has maintained a principled stand, making her party a natural refuge for those who still believe in genuine opposition politics.
Why the People’s Liberation Party?
The People’s Liberation Party stands as the closest alternative for politicians who want to remain true to the ideals of good governance, human rights, and constitutionalism. Martha Karua, a seasoned reformist, has consistently positioned herself as the conscience of Kenyan politics. She has rejected political convenience in favor of unwavering opposition to executive overreach.
By aligning himself with PLP, Sifuna would be making a statement—not just about his political future but about the future of opposition politics in Kenya. He would be telling Kenyans that principles matter more than political deals, and that true leadership means standing firm even when it is inconvenient.
What Would Resignation Mean for Sifuna?
Resigning from ODM would not be an easy decision. As Secretary-General, Sifuna holds a strategic position within the party, and leaving would come with political and personal risks. However, it could also elevate his stature as a leader who refuses to be part of a political formation that betrays its original mission.
His resignation would likely trigger a political realignment, inspiring other disillusioned ODM members and supporters to rethink their loyalty. It could also energize young politicians who believe in principled leadership and are looking for a home outside the mainstream political parties that have been accused of self-interest.
Furthermore, it would challenge ODM to reflect on whether it is still the party of liberation or just another political outfit pursuing power for its own sake. If Sifuna chooses to leave, it could be the beginning of a new movement that reignites the spirit of true opposition in Kenya.
The People’s Verdict: A Defining Moment for Sifuna
Ultimately, Sifuna’s decision will not just affect his political career—it will determine his legacy. If he stays in ODM despite its shifting alliances, he risks being seen as part of a compromised system. If he leaves, he positions himself as a leader willing to chart a new course for Kenya’s democratic future.
The people of Kenya want liberation. They want leaders who embody their struggles and hopes, not politicians who compromise when it is politically convenient. Sifuna has always been a fighter, an advocate for justice, and a believer in democracy. Now, he must decide—will he stand with the people and take a bold step towards real liberation, or will he remain in a party that is losing its ideological backbone?
The choice is his. But history will remember whether he chose principles over political expediency.
